True or False: An officer may pat down an individual for a weapon without reasonable suspicion of danger.

An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion of danger before conducting a pat-down search for weapons. This legal standard is rooted in the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. The pat-down, often referred to as a "Terry stop," is justified only when an officer has a reasonable belief that the person being stopped may be armed and dangerous.

Without this reasonable suspicion, the officer does not have the legal authority to conduct the search, as it would be considered unreasonable and a violation of the individual's rights. This ensures that the officer's actions are grounded in a legitimate concern for safety, rather than arbitrary or discriminatory practices.

Options suggesting that an officer can proceed with a pat-down based solely on an admission to carrying a weapon or the visible evidence of a weapon do not align with the legal principles governing such searches either; officers must still articulate their reasonable suspicion regardless of these factors. Thus, the accurate understanding of the necessity for reasonable suspicion in this context is reflected in the assertion that the statement is false.